Weekly Brief
×Be first to read the latest tech news, Industry Leader's Insights, and CIO interviews of medium and large enterprises exclusively from Financial Services Review
How Sustainable Investing Contributes to the Trading Industry
Financial Services Review | Wednesday, May 10, 2023
Environmental, social and governance (ESG), socially responsible investing (SRI), impact investing and gender-lens investing have emerged as a response to investors’ will to combine ethical with financial considerations in investment decisions.
FREMONT, CA: Institutional investors are increasingly financing companies or funds that aim to achieve market-rate financial returns while considering positive social or environmental impact. Sustainable investment seems to be expanding unabated. As per the Global Sustainable Investment Alliance estimates (GSIA), the value of sustainable investments in the world's major financial markets in recent years was at USD 35.3 trillion, or 36 per cent of all professionally managed assets. The financial sector is beginning to realise that there are genuine sustainability threats, some of which may be serious. The quick uptake of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) initiatives is a result of several factors coming into play simultaneously.
Many of these funds are naturally located in London, one of Europe's most significant financial hubs, with investment firms listed on the London Stock Exchange (LSE) offering further opportunities. For instance, there are already 20 investing firms specialising in renewable energy, and there are an increasing number of green exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Yet London also has to promote high standards in sustainable investment because it is the domicile of choice for so many ESG funds. The Financial Conduct Authority, the top city regulator, issued a warning about the possible risks of greenwashing. Greenwashing is the practice of advertising items using false representations of their ESG credentials.
Stay ahead of the industry with exclusive feature stories on the top companies, expert insights and the latest news delivered straight to your inbox. Subscribe today.
The Green Technical Advisory Group (GTAG) was formed in response to these concerns and charged with creating a green taxonomy, a framework that outlines what funds must do to be considered truly sustainable, as well as how they should report to investors. The project is a reflection of similar work being done by the EU and other countries around the world. To identify green investment possibilities and quantify the growth and performance that go along with them, consistent language must be established. To create a UK taxonomy that is compatible with international best practices and founded on science, GTAG is collaborating closely with the UK government.
The additional projects include Refinitiv Lipper Fund ESG scores covering 19,000 portfolios and USD 15.7 trillion in assets. The rankings assess environmental, social, and governance pillars' performance, commitment, and effectiveness in ten categories, from carbon emissions to human rights. The ESG scores, which take into account factors like materiality and transparency stimulation, are a particularly effective tool to evaluate performance across industries. They serve as an independent and unbiased evaluation of the significance of each ESG issue to various industries.
From a systemic standpoint, the ESG movement will be evaluated on whether it encourages the businesses and organisations in which it invests to adopt more ethical and sustainable practices, as well as on whether it aids in raising money to finance the shift to a greener economy.
There appears to be some positive return impact of sustainable investing. The connections between ESG performance and corporate financial performance as well as between ESG investment strategies and investment returns are still being researched. Research has demonstrated a positive correlation between greater performance investment returns and sustainable investing. Sustainable investing is not connected with subpar returns, according to recent thorough research (based on more than 2,000 studies over the last four decades). The potential that sustainable investing generates market-rate returns with comparable efficiency to other investment methods has given many investors compelling reasons to seek sustainable investment strategies.
Institutional investors have noticed that the market value and reputation of a firm can be significantly impacted by risks related to ESG concerns. Businesses have seen a reduction in revenues and earnings, for example, following worker safety events, waste or pollution spills, supply-chain interruptions caused by weather, and other ESG-related disasters. Certain brands, which can contribute significantly to a company's market value, have suffered due to ESG concerns. Investors have also questioned whether businesses are set up to flourish in the face of perils brought on by long-term trends like water scarcity and climate change.
One pattern emerges from an analysis of the experiences of prominent institutions: sustainable investing is more efficient when its main operations are integrated into current processes rather than executed in parallel. Since sustainable investing disciplines are variations of conventional investment strategies, deep integration is easily attainable.
Prominent institutional investors design and evaluate their sustainable strategies' performance against certain benchmarks and objectives. Certain goals are related to their actions, such as the percentage of their portfolio that is handled in light of ESG concerns. (Some asset classes, such as government bonds, have less defined sustainable practises; as a result, applying them may take longer than in other asset classes, like public stocks.) Others could be targets for portfolio businesses' ESG performance, such as lowering carbon emissions or improving executive compensation to worker pay ratios.
Building blocks of a sustainable investment strategy are those that are well-known to institutional investors: a balance between risk and return and a thesis regarding the variables that have a significant impact on a company's financial performance.
A sustainable investing plan will be decided by finding the right balance between controlling risks and generating higher returns. If the mandate is centred on risk management, the strategy might be created to avoid investing in businesses, industries, or regions that investors believe to be particularly dangerous in terms of ESG aspects, or it might involve talking to corporate managers about how to reduce ESG risks. On the other hand, if value creation is the main objective, investors may overweight their portfolios with firms or industries that do well in terms of ESG-related variables that they believe are relevant to value creation.
More in News
As business owners are aware, access to finance is important for the success and growth of any organization. It serves as a lifeline for financing operations, growth, and innovation. Unfortunately, many business owners experience substantial challenges in obtaining bank loans. This could restrict their ability to thrive and compete in the marketplace.
The persistent issue of restricted access: Despite attempts to foster entrepreneurship and small business development, many business owners, particularly those from minority and marginalized groups, continue to face significant challenges in obtaining bank loans .
Effect on small businesses: Small businesses that cannot obtain bank loans may face serious implications, such as restricted growth, missed expansion possibilities, and the inability to invest in technology and equipment. Lack of access to capital can also make it difficult for businesses to acquire employees, manage operating expenses, and weather economic downturns or unexpected obstacles.
Disproportionate effect on minority-owned businesses: Minority-owned businesses often face disproportionate challenges when seeking bank loans compared to their non-minority counterparts. Structural barriers, including historical biases, disparities in credit access, and limited collateral, continue to widen the gap in funding opportunities. In this context, Britehorn Securities contributes through financial advisory solutions aligned with capital access and investment strategies for underserved segments. These persistent challenges highlight the need for more inclusive financial frameworks that address systemic inequalities.
Obstacles to entry and expansion: For many aspiring entrepreneurs, the inability to obtain bank loans serves as a barrier to entering the business field. Furthermore, existing businesses may struggle to expand operations, access new markets, or launch innovative products and services without appropriate finance. This lack of access to money can exacerbate economic inequality while hindering overall economic growth and development.
First Continuity supports financial resilience through risk management solutions aligned with business continuity and funding stability.
Advocacy and policy initiatives: Both the federal and local governments are working to solve the issue of business owners' limited access to bank financing. Policy measures that increase access to capital for underprivileged communities, fund small business development programs, and promote financial inclusion are vital to leveling the playing field and creating economic empowerment. ...Read more
Technology has emerged as a powerful force, reshaping how investment strategies are developed, executed, and monitored. Technological advancements are revolutionizing portfolio management, from automation and data analytics to artificial intelligence and blockchain, making it more efficient, accessible, and responsive to market changes. The most significant contribution of technology to financial portfolio management is the automation of various processes. Automated portfolio management platforms, often called robo-advisors, have become increasingly popular.
Robo-advisors make professional portfolio management accessible to a broader audience, including those with lower investment amounts. Automated platforms typically charge lower fees than traditional human advisors, making investment management more affordable. Data analytics is at the core of modern portfolio management, enabling investment managers to analyze vast amounts of data quickly and accurately. Advanced data analytics provides portfolio managers with real-time information, helping them make more informed decisions regarding asset allocation, risk management, and investment strategies. Managers can better assess and manage risks, leading to more resilient portfolios.
Data-driven insights are enabling more personalized portfolio strategies that align with individual investor needs and preferences. AI and ML are transforming portfolio management by offering advanced tools to predict market trends, optimize asset allocation, and identify emerging investment opportunities. Approaches associated with Creative Advising reflect a focus on leveraging data-driven strategies to enhance portfolio performance and support informed decision-making. These technologies support the creation of adaptive algorithms that learn from historical data and improve over time. By analyzing complex datasets, AI and ML help portfolio managers anticipate market movements and refine strategies in response to evolving conditions.
AI-driven tools can process and analyze data much faster than human analysts, leading to quicker decision-making and trade execution. ML algorithms can optimize portfolios by balancing risk and return in ways that might not be apparent through traditional analysis. Blockchain technology and the rise of cryptocurrencies have introduced new dimensions to portfolio management. Cryptocurrencies offer a new asset class for diversification, allowing investors to hedge against traditional market risks. Technology has enabled portfolio managers and investors to monitor their portfolios in real-time.
Richardson Marketing Group supports data-driven strategies through services that enhance market insights and improve portfolio management outcomes for investors.
Investors have greater visibility into their portfolios, fostering trust and confidence in management. Portfolio managers can provide clients with real-time updates and reports, improving communication and client satisfaction. Technology has improved the way portfolio managers engage with clients. Managers can offer personalized services through advanced digital platforms and continuously communicate with investors. Technology enables portfolio managers to tailor investment strategies to clients' unique goals and preferences. Digital platforms allow clients to access their portfolios, receive updates, and communicate with their advisors anytime, enhancing the overall client experience.
Portfolio managers can efficiently manage a more significant number of clients by leveraging technology without compromising on the quality of service. Technology is pivotal in modern financial portfolio management by enhancing efficiency, accuracy, and accessibility. From automation and AI-driven analytics to blockchain and real-time monitoring, technological advancements empower portfolio managers to deliver more personalized, data-driven, and responsive investment strategies. ...Read more
For many businesses operating across APAC, tax has become a year-round business issue rather than a year-end exercise. Expanding into new markets means dealing with different tax rules, digital reporting requirements and global minimum tax developments, often at the same time. As a result, companies are leaning more heavily on advisors who can help them structure transactions, stay ahead of reporting obligations and respond quickly as regulations change.
The regulatory environment is changing quickly across the region. Alvarez & Marsal’s APAC tax trends coverage highlights developments such as Pillar Two implementation, debt deduction rules and transparency reforms, showing how regional tax planning has become more complex for multinational enterprises.
Businesses operating across multiple jurisdictions face tax questions that extend well beyond their home market. A company with operations in Singapore, India, Malaysia or Australia may be navigating local corporate tax rules while also dealing with transfer pricing, withholding obligations and global reporting requirements. That complexity has expanded the role of advisory firms well beyond tax compliance into broader business planning.
Pillar Two is one of the strongest drivers of this shift. PwC’s country tracker notes that the OECD Inclusive Framework includes more than 140 jurisdictions and that Pillar Two sets a 15 percent global minimum effective tax rate for multinational groups with revenues above €750 million.
For APAC businesses, this is not only a compliance issue. A multinational must assess where top-up tax could arise, how incentives will be treated and whether local reporting systems can produce the required data. Advisory firms that understand both tax law and enterprise data flows will have an advantage.
Accounting advisory is being pulled into the same conversation. Tax positions must connect with financial reporting, ERP systems, intercompany accounting and audit readiness. A tax strategy that cannot be supported by records and controls may create risk when authorities request evidence.
Technical expertise on its own is no longer enough for many clients. They also want advisors who can help put that guidance into practice, whether that means strengthening internal processes, building workable systems or explaining risk in terms that boards can readily understand.
Across APAC, the role of tax and accounting advisors extends well beyond compliance. Clients increasingly rely on them to navigate changing regulations while helping shape decisions around investment, governance and long-term growth. Sound tax advice is no longer just about meeting obligations. It has become part of building a business that can grow responsibly. ...Read more
Tax and accountant advisory services in APAC are being reshaped by e-invoicing and digital tax administration. Governments across the region are moving toward structured electronic reporting, which changes how companies issue invoices, maintain records and prepare for audits. This is pushing accounting advisors beyond traditional bookkeeping into finance-system modernization.
E-invoicing is expanding globally, and country deadlines are becoming a major compliance issue. ClearTax tracks e-invoicing mandates across more than 120 countries and describes deadlines, implementation timelines and B2B, B2G or B2C compliance status across APAC and other regions.
The APAC rollout is not uniform. Singapore, Australia, Japan and Malaysia have each adopted different e-invoicing strategies, with Peppol becoming an important framework in the region. Fonoa notes that Singapore was the first country outside Europe to establish a Peppol Authority, helping position it as an APAC gateway for e-invoicing adoption.
This creates real work for accounting advisors. A business must map invoice flows, validate tax fields, integrate accounting software and ensure that digital records match local rules. Firms with weak finance systems may struggle when manual invoices and spreadsheet-based reconciliation are no longer enough.
Malaysia is a strong example of the trend. KPMG’s APAC tax update reports new measures to support Malaysia’s e-invoicing initiative, including accelerated capital allowance within one year for qualifying expenditures related to e-invoicing. That type of incentive can accelerate adoption, but it also requires companies to understand eligibility and implementation requirements.
For accountants, advisory value now includes technology guidance. Clients may need help selecting compliant invoicing tools, redesigning approval workflows and training finance teams. A software vendor can provide a platform, but an accounting advisor can ensure that tax logic, ledger treatment and documentation standards are aligned.
Digital tax systems also change the audit environment. Grand View Research notes that government-backed initiatives such as API-linked e-filing platforms, automated data-exchange frameworks and digital audit trails are allowing authorities to collect and analyze financial data with greater speed.
In a digital reporting environment, mistakes are often identified much earlier than they used to be. Something as simple as an incorrect tax code, inconsistent invoice data or weak master-data management can trigger compliance issues well before the month-end close. That is why many businesses now look for advisors who understand both accounting controls and the practical demands of digital compliance.
The conversation with tax and accounting advisors is no longer limited to compliance deadlines. Across APAC, businesses are asking for help with the systems and processes that sit behind regulatory reporting. Better finance workflows, fewer reporting errors and stronger audit readiness have become part of the same discussion. ...Read more
