Making Risk a Better Decision Tool | Financial Services Review

A featured contribution from Leadership Perspectives, a curated forum for banking, financial services, and fintech leaders, nominated by our subscribers and vetted by the Financial Services Review Editorial Board.

Ally

Making Risk a Better Decision Tool

Stephanie Richard

Stephanie Richard

Banking Risk Champion

Stephanie Richard, Chief Risk Officer at Ally, has spent nearly three decades inside the company, moving through finance, treasury, internal audit and enterprise risk before taking on her current position in 2024. Her career has been shaped by a simple reality of banking. Risk decisions are rarely isolated events. They affect lending choices, capital planning and the pace at which an institution can respond to changing conditions.

Learning the Business From Multiple Angles

Consumer finance companies are navigating an awkward period. Interest rates have shifted customer behavior, regulators are paying closer attention to governance and new technologies are introducing questions that many institutions are still learning to answer. Risk leaders are expected to help businesses move forward while making sure the cost of a wrong decision is fully understood.

Few chief risk officers step into the role with Richard's institutional perspective. Her career at Ally has moved through finance, treasury, internal audit and enterprise risk, giving her direct exposure to the decisions that shape funding, governance and long-term planning. The progression created an understanding of the business that extends beyond any single function.

Building the Frameworks That Guide Decisions

That breadth of experience has influenced some of Ally’s core risk processes. Richard played a role in developing the company’s risk appetite framework and stress testing process, systems that help leadership teams evaluate how the business may perform under different economic conditions. Such work often receives little attention outside financial institutions, yet it shapes decisions that determine how aggressively a company can lend, invest or adjust its priorities.

The responsibilities of chief risk officers have also changed. Risk functions once carried a reputation for slowing decisions or stepping in after plans were already underway. Financial institutions now expect something different. They want risk teams involved earlier, helping executives understand tradeoffs before commitments are made.

Moving Risk Closer to Strategy

Richard has publicly described risk professionals as accelerators rather than brake pedals. The phrase suggests a more practical role for risk management. A useful risk function is not defined by the number of controls it creates. Its value often lies in giving decision-makers enough confidence to act while understanding the consequences if conditions shift.

That perspective matters at Ally because the company operates at considerable scale across digital banking and auto finance. The breadth of its business means risk management cannot be confined to a single function or a narrow set of rules. Credit exposure, customer expectations and regulatory obligations frequently intersect.

Translating Uncertainty Into Business Choices

No chief risk officer can rely solely on technical expertise in that environment. The role increasingly demands judgment and an ability to connect information from different parts of the organization. Richard’s career path suggests that institutional knowledge remains an important asset, particularly when companies are dealing with new technologies and economic uncertainty at the same time.

Financial services firms are likely to keep asking more of their risk leaders. They need executives who can translate risk into business choices and who understand how governance frameworks affect day-to-day decisions. Richard’s approach points toward a version of risk management that is less about restricting activity and more about helping organizations decide where they can move with conviction and where restraint still has a place.

The articles from these contributors are based on their personal expertise and viewpoints, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of their employers or affiliated organizations.