Over the past few years, the attention of companies, investors and, in general, of all their stakeholders, has increasingly turned to issues such as the assessment of the impact of processes, products and services on natural resources, the implementation of safeguards aimed at their correct use in the production process, the evaluation of measures taken to ensure the rights, health and safety of workers, and the definition and implementation of principles of corporate governance and corporate behaviour that guide the conduct of the business activity. As a result of an increasing collective awareness of key issues such as the effects of climate change and growing social inequalities, these issues have become priorities.
The main aimof theincreased focuson these matters isto promote a long-term value creation for shareholders, communities, and the local areas through sustained growth in wages, labour productivity, job creation, profits, and remuneration to shareholders, as well as disclosing expenditure on research and development, investments, promotion of human capital as indicated in the 17 Sustainable Development Goals of the 2030 Agenda issued by the United Nations in 2015.
Banking industry, as one of the main financing sources within the economic system, is an essential component of the international framework. For this reason, the European Union, in the ‘EU Action Plan for Financing Sustainable Growth’, identified financing activities as a key factor in the transition process,reorienting capital flows towards to a more sustainable economy. Banks must, therefore, improve the management of their ‘material ESG risks’ and increasingly integrate ESG factors into their lending activities, also by adopting dedicated financial instruments such as ‘sustainability-linked’and/or‘‘green’ loans,’‘bonds’ or‘securitizations.’ They will also have to consider how to integrate ESG risks within the Pillar 2 processes (i.e. capital adequacy), in ICAAP reporting and, consequently, in the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP), while also strengthening their market disclosures on ‘ESG related financial risks.’
Sustainability reporting is increasingly considered an effective tool for monitoring, reporting, and communicating the process undertaken by banks in terms of responsible management, whose aim is to make the environmental, social, and economic performance visible. Moreover, in addition to contributing to the positive reputation of the company, sustainability reporting represents a planning and control tool that analyses the activities and services performed by the bank by evaluating them according to an economic efficiency and environmental and social protection logic.
Supervisory authorities are also paying more attention to sustainability issues. For example, ESMA has emphasised that it is essential to strengthen the quality of disclosure, particularly with regards to the relevance, completeness, balance, and accessibility of information, both qualitative (policies adopted) and quantitative (KPIs and targets). Alsothe European Central Bank and individual national central banks have also recently conducting deep dives into supervised institutionsbyspecific discussions and thematic reviews. In fact, they are conducting inquiries and investigations into supervised institutions,observing if current practicesmeet the supervisory expectations on climate-related and environmental risks. Consequently, supervisorsrequestthese governing bodies to approvespecific initiatives aimed at defining a path of progressive alignment with expectations, setting out a timeframe for the reviewof key corporate policies and organisational and management systems.
The role of the Chief Financial Officer becomes essential, given the complexity of the activities and services performed by banks. The ESG data will have to be integrated into the reporting system and the related system of internal controls, which is currently in place for the preparation of the financial information. This is because stakeholders are increasingly demanding sustainability data and information to be reliable in its qualityand, above all, to be comparable.
The issue of comparability and quality of the information produced is also an issue that is currently receiving much attention by standard-setters. Today, there are various regulatory frameworksapplied by supervised entities (including, among the others, the GRI Standards and the reporting standards prepared by the IFRS Foundation through the International Sustainability Standards Board –‘ISSB’) with the risk of inconsistent and not homogeneous application of standards by different intermediaries.
" The role of the Chief Financial Officer becomes essential, given the complexity of the activities and services performed by banks "
Thus, on November 10, 2022, the European Parliament approved the ‘Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive’ (or ‘CSRD’), which aims to amend the reporting requirements set forth in the current ‘Non-Financial Reporting Directive’ (or ‘NFRD’). The directive requires Member States to implement the laws, regulations, and administrative provisions necessary to comply with the directive by July 6, 2024. Enforcement is mandatory and has different timeframes depending on the entities involved: companies subject to the NFRD must implement the directive by 2024itself,large companies not currently subject to the NFRD under Article 3 of Directive 2013/34/EU must implement the directive by 2025, and listed SMEs, small and non-complex credit institutions, and captive insurance companies by 2026, with an option to postponethe implementation of the new regulation for two years.
Under this directive, it is explicitlystatedthat the sustainability information required by CSRD will have to be reported using the ‘European Sustainability Reporting Standards (or ‘ESRS’)’ developed by EFRAG. On November 15, 2022, EFRAG's Sustainability Reporting Board approved the first 12 Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) after anexercise of substantial revision of the exposure drafts published in April 2022, and whose public consultation closed on August 8, 2022.
It is also noteworthy to remember that a process of convergence to other reference frameworks including the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), and the reporting standards prepared by the IFRS Foundation, through the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB), has been undertaken by the EU, particularly in the reporting areas.
The role of the CFO is also further highlighted when, in accordance with the aforementionedlegislation, the mandatory statement on the compliance of the information, reported in the Annual Report on operations,with the EFRAG Reporting Standards and the EU Taxonomywill be producedby the Financial Reporting Manager.
Finally, there will also be an obligation to receive an attestation with a level of ‘limited assurance’ (with the possibility, at a later stage, to switch to a ‘’reasonable assurance’’)from independententity on the preparation of the disclosures, on the compliance of the information with the regulatory framework, and on the verification of the process followed to identifyrelevant information.
The CFO must, therefore, increasingly adapt his role to ensure the productionof an integrated information, something that banks increasinglyhave to consider in the definition of thestrategic business decisions and in managing the overall risks to which they are subject.
